Lung Parenchymal Assessment in Primary and Secondary Pneumothorax

Oliver J Bintcliffe, Anthony J Edey, Lynne Armstrong, Ian S Negus, Nick A Maskell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

RATIONALE: The definition of primary spontaneous pneumothorax excludes patients with known lung disease; however, the assumption that the underlying lung is normal in these patients is increasingly contentious.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess lung structure and compare the extent of emphysema in patients with primary versus secondary spontaneous pneumothorax and to patients with no pneumothorax in an otherwise comparable control group.

METHODS: We identified patients treated for pneumothorax by screening inpatient and outpatient medical records at one medical center in the U.K. From this group, 20 patients had no clinically apparent underlying lung disease and were classified as having a primary spontaneous pneumothorax, and 20 patients were classified as having a secondary spontaneous pneumothorax. We assembled a control group composed of 40 subjects matched for age and smoking history who had a unilateral pleural effusion or were suspected to have a thoracic malignancy and had a chest computed tomography (CT) scan suitable for quantitative analysis. Demographics and smoking histories were collected. Quantitative evaluation of low attenuation areas of the lung on CT imaging was performed using semi-automated software and the extent of emphysema-like destruction was assessed visually.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The extent of emphysema and percentage of low attenuation areas was greater for patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax compared with controls matched for age and smoking history (median 0.25% vs 0.00%, p=0.019), and was also higher for patients with secondary pneumothorax compared to those with primary spontaneous pneumothorax (16.15% vs 0.25%, p<0.001). Primary pneumothorax patients who smoked had significantly greater low attenuation area than primary pneumothorax patients who were non-smokers (0.7% vs 0.1%, p=0.034).

CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax had quantifiable evidence of parenchymal destruction and emphysema. The exclusion of patients with underlying lung disease from the definition of primary spontaneous pneumothorax should be reappraised.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnnals of the American Thoracic Society
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Dec 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Lung Parenchymal Assessment in Primary and Secondary Pneumothorax'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this