Abstract
This chapter analyzes the inferential structure of machine learning (ML) systems, and shows how these can be value-laden in unexpected ways. ML systems follow an inductive inferential strategy, which is based on two components. First, there is the basic assumption that we are entitled to predict future events on the basis of past occurrences because the world will not drastically change. This assumption is called ‘uniformity of nature’ (UoN). Second, ‘canons of inductive inference’ (CIIs) are required to narrow down the set of possible hypotheses that one can generate from UoN. Debates on the ethics of ML have focused on CIIs. Here I show that UoN plays an important ethical role, in particular in eroding human agency.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Philosophy of Science for Machine Learning |
| Subtitle of host publication | Core Issues and New Perspectives |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media B.V. |
| Pages | 361-380 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2026 |
Publication series
| Name | Synthese Library |
|---|---|
| Volume | 527 |
| ISSN (Print) | 0166-6991 |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 2542-8292 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2026.
Keywords
- AI ethics
- Ethics of AI
- Induction
- Machine learning