Abstract
We provide an analysis of theory-ladenness in machine learning (ML) in science, where ‘theory’ (that we call ‘domain-theory’) refers to the domain knowledge of the scientific discipline where ML is used. By constructing an account of ML models based on a comparison with phenomenological models, we show (against recent trends in philosophy of science) that ML model-building is mostly indifferent to domain-theory, even if the model remains theory-laden in a weak sense, which we call theory-infection. These claims, we argue, have far-reaching consequences for the transferability of ML across scientific disciplines, and shift the priorities of the debate on theory-ladenness in ML from descriptive to normative
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 94 |
| Number of pages | 32 |
| Journal | Synthese |
| Volume | 207 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 17 Feb 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2026.
Keywords
- machine learning
- theory-ladenness
- scientific models
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Machine learning and theory-ladenness: a phenomenological account'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver