Major morphological changes in a Lake Victoria cichlid fish within two decades

Frans Witte, Monique Welten, Martin Heemskerk, Irene Van der Stap, Lisanne Ham, Hendrikus (Carlo) Rutjes, Jan Wanink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During the upsurge of the introduced predatory Nile perch in Lake Victoria in the 1980s, the zooplanktivorous Haplochromis (Yssichromis) pyrrhocephalus nearly vanished. The species recovered coincident with the intense fishing of Nile perch in the 1990s, when water clarity and dissolved oxygen levels had decreased dramatically due to increased eutrophication. In response to the hypoxic conditions, total gill surface in resurgent H. pyrrhocephalus
increased by 64%. Remarkably, head length, eye length, and head volume decreased in size, whereas cheek depth increased. Reductions in eye size and depth of the rostral part of the musculus sternohyoideus, and reallocation of space between the opercular and suspensorial compartments of the head may have permitted accommodation of larger gills in a smaller head. By contrast, the musculus levator posterior, located dorsal to the gills, increased in depth. This probably reflects an adaptive response to the larger and tougher prey types in the diet of resurgent H. pyrrhocephalus. These striking morphological changes over a time span of only two decades could be the combined result of phenotypic plasticity and genetic change and may have fostered recovery of this
species.
Original languageEnglish
Article number94
Pages (from-to)41-52
Number of pages12
JournalBiological Journal of the Linnean Society
Volume94
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Apr 2008

Keywords

  • adaptive responses
  • eye size
  • genetic changes
  • gill size
  • head morphology
  • hypoxia
  • phenotypic plasticity
  • spatial constraints
  • water transparency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Major morphological changes in a Lake Victoria cichlid fish within two decades'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this