Abstract
This paper examines the problematisation of sex-selective abortion (SSA) in UK parliamentary debates on Fiona Bruce’s Abortion (Sex-Selection) Bill 2014–15 and on the subsequent proposed amendment to the Serious Crime Bill 2014–15. On the basis of close textual analysis, we argue that a discursive framing of SSA as a form of cultural oppression of minority women in need of protection underpinned Bruce’s Bill; in contrast, by highlighting issues more commonly articulated in defence of women’s reproductive rights, the second set of debates displaced this framing in favour of a broader understanding, drawing on postcolonial feminist critiques, of how socio-economic factors constrain all women in this regard. We argue that the problematisation of SSA explains the original cross-party support for, and subsequent defeat of, the policies proposed to restrict SSA. Our analysis also highlights the central role of ideology in the policy process, thus making politics visible in policymaking.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-19 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Feminist Review |
| Volume | 120 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018, The Feminist Review Collective.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Research Groups and Themes
- SPS Centre for Gender and Violence Research
- SPS Social Harm Crime and Violence Research Centre
Keywords
- Fiona Bruce
- policy analysis
- postcolonial feminism
- Serious Crime Bill
- sex-selective abortion
- South Asian women
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'making politics visible: discourses on gender and race in the problematisation of sex-selective abortion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver