Making Progress: 'Sex trafficking', Sex Work, Temporality and Im/mobility

Dr. Julio Davies, Julia N O'Connell Davidson, Ana Paula Silva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Anti-trafficking discourse is built upon and reproduces a series of either/or conceptual binaries (voluntary/forced, consensual/coerced, agent/victim) which obscure the unseen, structural factors that shape the fates of men, women and children under the economic, social and political relations of global capitalism, as well as their experience as workers in given countries, sectors and workplaces. Some sex worker rights activists and scholars have contested its application to prostitution by emphasising that ‘not all sex workers are trafficked’. However, this position also privileges the question of whether an individual voluntarily chose or was coerced by a third party into a given form of work. Drawing on biographical interview data with women in sex work in Brazil that shows how past, present and hopes for the future are woven together in their sex work trajectories, this article adds to the literature that critiques anti-trafficking discourse through a focus on temporality. It argues that by following the trajectories of sex working women’s lives over time, it is possible to better grasp both the protean nature of sex work, and the impossibility of fixing people’s participation in it as either forced or free.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalSociological Research Online
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 17 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • sex work
  • Mobility
  • trafficking
  • Temporality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making Progress: 'Sex trafficking', Sex Work, Temporality and Im/mobility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this