Making the case for a fracture liaison service: a qualitative study of the experiences of clinicians and service managers

S. Drew, R. Gooberman-Hill, A. Farmer, L. Graham, M.K. Javaid, C. Cooper, A. Judge, REFRESH study group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To develop services, healthcare professionals must make business cases to managerial bodies within Hospital Trusts and if approved, to commissioning bodies. Patients with hip fracture are at high risk of subsequent fracture. To prevent this, guidance recommends structuring fracture prevention services around coordinator based models. These are known as Fracture Liaison Services (FLS).

METHODS: 33 semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals with experience of making business cases for FLS. Data was analysed thematically.

RESULTS: Challenges in the development of business cases included collecting all the relevant data and negotiating compartmentalised budgets that impeded service development. Participants described communication and cooperation between providers and commissioners as variable. They felt financial considerations were the most important factor in funding decisions, while improved quality of care was less influential. Other factors included national guidelines and political priorities. The personalities of clinicians championing services, and the clinical interests of commissioners were seen to influence the decision-making process, suggesting that participants felt that decisions were not always made on the basis of evidence-based care. Effective strategies included ways of providing support, demonstrating potential cost effectiveness and improved quality of care. Using a range of sources including audit data collected on the successful Glasgow FLS, and improving cooperation between stakeholders was advocated. Participants felt that the work of commissioners and providers should be better integrated and suggested strategies for doing this.

CONCLUSIONS: This study provides information to healthcare professionals about how best to develop business cases for FLS. We conclude with recommendations on how to develop effective cases. These include using guidance such as toolkits, aligning the aims of FLS with national priorities and benchmarking services against comparators. Introducing a 'Local Champion' to work alongside the service manager and establishing a multi-disciplinary working team would facilitate communication between stakeholders. Involving commissioners in service design would help integrate the roles of purchasers and providers.

Original languageEnglish
Article number274
Number of pages1
JournalBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2015

Keywords

  • REFReSH study group
  • Humans
  • Hip Fractures
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Pilot Projects
  • Qualitative Research
  • Health Personnel
  • Health Services Research
  • England
  • Female
  • Male

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making the case for a fracture liaison service: a qualitative study of the experiences of clinicians and service managers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this