Making things right: the true consequences of epistemic consequentialism

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter in a book


In his 1998 paper, ‘A Nonpragmatic Vindication of Probabilism’, Jim Joyce offered a novel argument for the credal principle of Probabilism. In this paper, I consider an objection to Joyce’s argument that has been raised by Hilary Greaves (‘Epistemic Decision Theory’, Mind, 2013); and I try to answer that objection.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEpistemic Consequentialism
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'Making things right: the true consequences of epistemic consequentialism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this