Abstract
This paper examines how climate risk transparency influences house prices and credit supply. I contend that inadequate property-level climate risk disclosures induce homebuyers to demand a risk aversion discount on house prices, creating a potential “market for lemons.” Employing a stacked difference-in-differences design, I find that flood risk disclosure laws (FRDLs), by enhancing dwelling-specific flood risk transparency, raise house prices on average by 7.6%. Results are stronger in states with stricter disclosure requirements. Exploiting within-state heterogeneity and controlling for housing market trends, I find that the effects persist and intensify in regions with higher aggregate exposure to flood risk, greater information frictions, and more attention to climate risks. Conversely, households’ misbeliefs about climate change attenuate the effectiveness of FRDLs. Additionally, less sophisticated lenders extend credit to financially constrained borrowers in response to FRDLs but experience lower profitability.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Review of Accounting Studies |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 29 Mar 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Mandatory Climate Risk Disclosure, Housing Prices, and Credit Supply'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver