Abstract
We examine whether mandatory data breach disclosure affects insider-selling behavior and find that selling profits are greater after states require firms to disclose data breaches. The effect is more pronounced for firms with weaker corporate governance, higher cybersecurity risk, and without prior investment in material cyber protection programs. However, insiders profit less when they operate in states with stricter laws and face higher litigation risks. The evidence is consistent withmanagers personally hedging risks in the capital market when mandatory disclosure laws designedto protect customers are weakly enforced. Laws designed to improve transparency in the productmarkets may have the unintended effect of reducing the integrity of financial markets. However,insider sales also facilitate the incorporation of bad news in stock prices, making idiosyncraticcrashes less likely.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Business Finance and Accounting |
| Early online date | 3 Dec 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 3 Dec 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.