Mapping the current landscape of locoregional therapy de-escalation trials in early breast cancer: a systematic review

Alan McCrorie, Hilary Stobart, David Dodwell, Stuart A McIntosh, Shelley Potter*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

A systematic review undertaken to map the current landscape of locoregional de-escalation trials to inform future research. Online databases and trial registries were searched to identify ongoing, recently completed or published studies de-escalating surgery or radiotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. 97 trials evaluated de-escalation of surgery or radiotherapy in up to 94,866 participants. Surgery studies more commonly evaluated treatment omission/reduction after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) and de-escalation of nodal treatment. Radiotherapy studies were more frequently biomarker stratified. Patients were rarely involved in study design. Research questions focused on response-adjusted treatment after NST and omission/reduction of locoregional therapy in patients with low- or intermediate-risk disease. Significant duplication was identified with multiple studies addressing similar questions. This systematic review demonstrates that the current de-escalation portfolio is inefficient, lacks patient focus and needs improvement. An internationally collaborative approach using innovative study designs and patient partnership will be essential to address this.
Original languageEnglish
Article number32
Number of pages11
Journalnpj Breast Cancer
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mapping the current landscape of locoregional therapy de-escalation trials in early breast cancer: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this