Maximising the effectiveness of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: should we routinely retest positives?

Sarah C. Woodhall; Katherine M. E. Turner; Gwenda Hughes

doi:10.1136/sextrans-2012-050967

Maximising the effectiveness of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: should we routinely retest positives?

Sarah C. Woodhall^*, Katherine M. E. Turner, Gwenda Hughes

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial (Academic Journal) › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2-3
Number of pages	2
Journal	Sexually Transmitted Infections
Volume	89
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2012-050967
Publication status	Published - Feb 2013

Keywords

Adolescent
Animals
Bacteriological Techniques
Chlamydia Infections
England
Female
Health Policy
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
Recurrence
Young Adult

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1136/sextrans-2012-050967

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{dd67e00ebce14e9489d30ce6c3427e5f,

title = "Maximising the effectiveness of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: should we routinely retest positives?",

keywords = "Adolescent, Animals, Bacteriological Techniques, Chlamydia Infections, England, Female, Health Policy, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Recurrence, Young Adult",

author = "Woodhall, \{Sarah C.\} and Turner, \{Katherine M. E.\} and Gwenda Hughes",

year = "2013",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1136/sextrans-2012-050967",

language = "English",

volume = "89",

pages = "2--3",

journal = "Sexually Transmitted Infections",

issn = "1368-4973",