Mechanical modelling of 3D woven composites considering realistic unit cell geometry

S. D. Green*, M. Y. Matveev, A. C. Long, D. Ivanov, S. R. Hallett

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

262 Citations (Scopus)
697 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Modelling the mechanical performance of textile composites is typically based on idealised unit cell geometry. However, 3D woven composites feature more complex textile architecture then 2D woven materials, and in reality nominally straight warp and weft yarns can also possess significant waviness. For such textiles, idealising yarns as straight entities becomes an oversimplification. In this study, the voxel method and a continuum damage model are used in a finite element analysis to compute stress-strain curves for an orthogonal 3D woven composite under tensile loading. The main goal of this study was to compare results produced using idealised geometry with realistic geometry obtained from detailed simulation of the preform during weaving and compaction. Significant variation in predictions was obtained using the different geometrical models. The idealised model lead to an overestimation of stiffness and strength compared to experiment due to the neglecting of yarn waviness, whereas the simulated geometry models produced more conservative results closer to experiment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)284-293
Number of pages10
JournalComposite Structures
Volume118
Issue number1
Early online date24 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

Research Groups and Themes

  • Composites UTC

Keywords

  • 3D woven composite
  • Unit cell
  • Finite element analysis (FEA)
  • Virtual test
  • Voxel
  • FINITE-ELEMENT MODEL
  • FABRIC COMPOSITES
  • CARBON-FIBERS
  • REINFORCED COMPOSITES
  • TEXTILE COMPOSITES
  • ELASTIC BEHAVIOR
  • CONVEX-HULL
  • FAILURE
  • MODULUS
  • DAMAGE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanical modelling of 3D woven composites considering realistic unit cell geometry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this