Metaphysical interdependence

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter in a book

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that grounding relations are asymmetric. Here I develop and argue for a theory of metaphysical structure that takes grounding to be nonsymmetric rather than asymmetric. Even without infinite descending chains of dependence, it might be that every entity is grounded in some other entity. Having first addressed an immediate objection to the position under discussion, I introduce two examples of symmetric grounding. I give three arguments for the view that grounding is nonsymmetric (I call this view ‘metaphysical interdependence’). These arguments are: (i) that metaphysical interdependence is the only theory able to reconcile competing intuitions about grounding; (ii) that it is the only theory consistent with both ‘gunk’ and ‘junk’; and (iii) that offers a satisfactory solution to the problem concerning whether or not grounding is itself grounded.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationReality Making
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Metaphysical interdependence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this