Methods and approaches to facilitate inclusion of the views, perspectives and preferences of people with moderate‐to‐severe dementia in research: A narrative systematic review

Rachel Collins, Anthony Martyr*, Anna Hunt, Catherine Quinn, Claire Pentecost, Julian C. Hughes, Linda Clare

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Background
The perspectives of people with moderate-to-severe dementia are rarely directly elicited in research studies.

Objectives
This systematic review will explore methods and approaches for including the perspectives and preferences of people with moderate-to-severe dementia in research.

Methods
AgeLine, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Social Policy and Practice and Web of Science were searched until June 16 2022. Study quality was assessed using the 16-item Quality Assessment Tool. We described specific communication tools, reviewed the evidence for their effectiveness and considered their strengths and limitations. We examined the more general communication skills and techniques applied to support the use of these tools using thematic synthesis. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO CRD42019130386 and the review was conducted and reported according to PRISMA guidelines.

Results
Seven studies reported in 11 publications were included. In these studies five specific communication tools were used: Talking Mats, Augmentative and Alternative Communication Flexiboard, generic photographs in combination with a preference placement board, consultation ballot and personalised communication prescriptions. Each tool identified had advantages and disadvantages depending on dementia severity, verbal or physical ability, expense, researcher training requirements and ease of use. Thematic synthesis identified five general approaches to optimising communication that were employed to support use of the tools: ensuring conversations are individual and person-centred, managing external influences, engaging others, creating structure and facilitation skills.

Conclusion
All tools had some utility and there was no clear evidence to support the recommendation of any one specific tool; therefore, researchers are advised to select the tool most appropriate to their context.

Implications for Practice
The findings offer general guidance for researchers and practitioners on how to facilitate communication with people with moderate-to-severe dementia.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12594
JournalInternational Journal of Older People Nursing
Volume19
Issue number1
Early online date11 Dec 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Older People Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methods and approaches to facilitate inclusion of the views, perspectives and preferences of people with moderate‐to‐severe dementia in research: A narrative systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this