Skip to content

Micropolitics and the minor

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)563-567
Number of pages5
JournalEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space
Volume35
Issue number4
Early online date2 Aug 2017
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 2 Aug 2017
DatePublished (current) - Aug 2017

Abstract

Micropolitical investments and minor theoretical energies are of growing concern to geographers, yet conceptual ambiguity has inhibited broader discussion and deployment of these terms, even if they are the pivots of what we understand as, or take to be, the ‘political’. In an effort to reinvigorate a dialogue about these crucial but underplayed concepts, and in an effort to push a micropolitical ethos in and of itself, we introduce a forum composed of six short interventions by geographers engaged in matters of the minor and micropolitical. Following these interventions, and leaning on a landmark article published in this journal 21 years ago, Cindi Katz revisits and reflects upon a vibrant conceptual assemblage that perhaps matters more now than ever, not least in questions of hope, discipline, ethics, existence, and politics itself.

    Research areas

  • Micropolitics, minor theory, ethics, hope, discipline

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Sage at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263775817718013. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 183 KB, PDF document

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups