Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mid-to late-term follow-up of primary hip and knee arthroplasty: the UK SAFE evidence-based recommendations

  • Sarah R. Kingsbury
  • , Lindsay K. K. Smith
  • , Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva
  • , Andrew Judge
  • , Robert M. West
  • , Judy Wright
  • , Martin H. Stone
  • , Philip G Conaghan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims
To review the evidence and reach consensus on recommendations for follow-up after total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Methods
A programme of work was conducted, including: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness literature; analysis of routine national datasets to identify pre-, peri-, and postoperative predictors of mid-to-late term revision; prospective data analyses from 560 patients to understand how patients present for revision surgery; qualitative interviews with NHS managers and orthopaedic surgeons; and health economic modelling. Finally, a consensus meeting considered all the work and agreed the final recommendations and research areas.

Results
The UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE) recommendations apply to post-primary hip and knee arthroplasty follow-up. The ten-year time point is based on a lack of robust evidence beyond ten years. The term 'complex cases' refers to individual patient and surgical factors that may increase the risk for arthroplasty failure. For Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) 10A* minimum implants, it is safe to disinvest in routine follow-up from one to years post-non-complex hip and knee arthroplasty provided there is rapid access to orthopaedic review. For ODEP 10A* minimum implants in complex cases, or non-ODEP 10A* minimum implants, periodic follow-up post-hip and knee arthroplasty may be required from one to ten years. At ten years post-hip and knee arthroplasty, clinical and radiological evaluation is recommended. After ten years post-hip and knee arthroplasty, frequency of further follow-up should be based on the ten-year assessment; ongoing rapid access to orthopaedic review is still required.

Conclusion
Complex cases, implants not meeting the ODEP 10A* criteria, and follow-up after revision surgery are not covered by this recommendation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)72 - 78
Number of pages7
JournalBone & joint open
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Feb 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research Programme (14/70/146) and by the NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). A.J. is supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Author(s) et al.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mid-to late-term follow-up of primary hip and knee arthroplasty: the UK SAFE evidence-based recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this