Migrant worker policies and national privilege: A UK case study

Pier-Luc Dupont*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

After a long period of decline in the Global North, migrant worker policies are making a comeback on the agenda of the European Union and several of its member states. Inspired by Iris Marion Young and Nancy Fraser’s accounts of structural injustice, this article argues that such policies cannot be reconciled with the principle of equality between migrant and national workers enshrined in international legal instruments such as the Convention on Migrant Workers and the EU Seasonal Workers Directive. To make this point it draws on a selection of UK based empirical literature as well as primary data from a recent study on domestic workers admitted to the UK under temporary visas since 1998. Results suggest that such visas tend to push migrants’ working conditions downwards (exploitation); prevent them from changing employer, enforcing rights in court or mobilising in unions (domination); and ultimately exacerbate racial conflict and stereotyping (stigmatisation).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-36
Number of pages26
JournalDeusto Journal of Human Rights
Issue number7 (2021)
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jun 2021

Structured keywords

  • Migration Mobilities Bristol
  • Perspectives on Work
  • SPAIS Centre for the Study of Ethnicity and Citizenship

Keywords

  • migrant workers
  • human rights
  • discrimination
  • racism
  • exploitation
  • domination

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Migrant worker policies and national privilege: A UK case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this