Abstract
Recent philosophical secondary literature on white ignorance – a concept most famously developed by the late philosopher Charles W. Mills – suggests that white ignorance is, one way or another, a non-structural phenomenon. I analyse two such readings, the agential view and the cognitivist view. I argue that they misinterpret Mills’ work by (among other things) committing a kind of structural erasure, and one which implies that Mills’ account cannot capture, for example, cases where white ignorance (and white racial domination) involves historical erasure, especially when perpetrated by sociopolitical institutions. This is particularly salient in cases such as the recent movement against anti-racist education, now widely conflated with critical race theory, in the United States and United Kingdom, which I offer as a brief case study.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 18-32 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Theory and Research in Education |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 23 Mar 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: The research used in the writing of this article was partly supported by a studentship from the Arts and Humanities Research Council’s South-West and Wales Doctoral Training Partnership.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
Keywords
- Charles W. Mills
- critical race theory
- education
- structural racism
- white ignorance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Mills’s account of white ignorance: Structural or non-structural?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver