Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral)

Rebecca H Maier, Adetayo S Kasim, Joseph Zacharias, Luke Vale, Richard Graham, Antony Walker, Grzegorz Laskawski, Ranjit Deshpande, Andrew Goodwin, Simon Kendall, Gavin J Murphy, Vipin Zamvar, Renzo Pessotto, Clinton Lloyd, Malcolm Dalrymple-Hay, Roberto Casula, Hunaid A Vohra, Franco Ciulli, Massimo Caputo, Serban StoicaMax Baghai, Gunaratnam Niranjan, Prakash P Punjabi, Olaf Wendler, Leanne Marsay, Cristina Fernandez-Garcia, Paul Modi, Bilal H Kirmani, Mark D Pullan, Andrew D Muir, Dimitrios Pousios, Helen C Hancock, Enoch Akowuah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
103 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Numbers of patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVr) surgery for severe mitral regurgitation have grown and will continue to rise. MVr is routinely performed via median sternotomy; however, there is a move towards less invasive surgical approaches.There is debate within the clinical and National Health Service (NHS) commissioning community about widespread adoption of minimally invasive MVr surgery in the absence of robust research evidence; implementation requires investment in staff and infrastructure.The UK Mini Mitral trial will provide definitive evidence comparing patient, NHS and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing MVr surgery. It will establish the best surgical approach for MVr, setting a standard against which emerging percutaneous techniques can be measured. Findings will inform optimisation of cost-effective practice.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: UK Mini Mitral is a multicentre, expertise based randomised controlled trial of minimally invasive thoracoscopically guided right minithoracotomy versus conventional sternotomy for MVr. The trial is taking place in NHS cardiothoracic centres in the UK with established minimally invasive mitral valve surgery programmes. In each centre, consenting and eligible patients are randomised to receive surgery performed by consultant surgeons who meet protocol-defined surgical expertise criteria. Patients are followed for 1 year, and consent to longer term follow-up.Primary outcome is physical functioning 12 weeks following surgery, measured by change in Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) physical functioning scale. Early and 1 year echo data will be reported by a core laboratory. Estimates of key clinical and health economic outcomes will be reported up to 5 years.The primary economic outcome is cost effectiveness, measured as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained over 52 weeks following index surgery.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A favourable opinion was given by Wales REC 6 (16/WA/0156). Trial findings will be disseminated to patients, clinicians, commissioning groups and through peer reviewed publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13930454.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere047676
Pages (from-to)e047676
JournalBMJ Open
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Apr 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
1Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 2Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK 3The Lancashire Cardiac Centre, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK 4Health Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK 5Cardiothoracic Surgery, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK 6Cardiothoracic Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 7Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK 8Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK 9Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK 10Cardiothoracic Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK 11Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK 12Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK 13Cardiac Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK 14Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK Twitter Vipin Zamvar @VipinZamvar Acknowledgements We are grateful to the IDMEC, TSC, and the independent expert panel for their support of the trial. We would like to acknowledge the considerable work being undertaken by Principal Investigators and members of the site teams, and at Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit in support of this trial. Contributors EA and JZ conceived the idea for the trial. EA, RHM, HCH, ASK, GJM, JZ and LV codesigned the trial, secured funding from NIHR HTA and wrote the protocol. EA is chief Investigator. RHM and HCH provide methodological input and oversee NCTU activity. ASK leads statistical aspects and analysis. LV leads health economic aspects and analysis, supported by CF-G. LM manages the trial. RG leads the core laboratory. GJM provides ongoing clinical and academic contributions. JZ, AW, GL, RD, AG, SK, VZ, RP, CL, MD-H, RC, HAV, FC, SS, MC, MB, GN, PPP, OW, PM, BHK, MDP, ADM and DP are surgeons in the trial and who have contributed to ongoing trial design and the Statistical Analysis Plan. This paper was drafted from the approved version of the protocol, version 5.0, 18th June 2020; all authors commented and amended drafts of the paper and approved the final manuscript.

Funding Information:
Funding This work is supported by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme (Ref: 14/192/110). The UK Mini Mitral Trial is sponsored by South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
  • Humans
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Mitral Valve/surgery
  • Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • State Medicine
  • Sternotomy
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United Kingdom
  • Wales

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for Mitral valve repair: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (UK Mini Mitral)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this