Mixed methods process evaluation of my breathing matters, a digital intervention to support self-management of asthma

Kate Greenwell*, Ben Ainsworth, Anne Bruton, Elizabeth Murray, Daniel Russell, Mike Thomas, Lucy Yardley

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study aimed to explore user engagement with ‘My Breathing Matters’, a digital self-management intervention for asthma, and identify factors that may influence engagement. In a mixed methods design, adults with asthma allocated to the intervention arm of a feasibility trial (n = 44) participated in semi-structured interviews (n = 18) and a satisfaction questionnaire (n = 36) to explore their views and experiences of the intervention. Usage data highlighted that key intervention content was delivered to most users. The majority of questionnaire respondents (78%; n = 28) reported they would recommend the intervention to friends and family. Interviewees expressed positive views of the intervention and experienced several benefits, mainly improved asthma control, medication use, and breathing technique. Factors that may influence user engagement were identified, including perceptions of asthma control, current self-management practices, and appeal of the target behaviours and behaviour change techniques. Findings suggested My Breathing Matters was acceptable and engaging to participants, and it was used as intended.
Original languageEnglish
Article number35
Number of pages14
Journalnpj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
Volume31
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jun 2021

Structured keywords

  • Physical and Mental Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mixed methods process evaluation of my breathing matters, a digital intervention to support self-management of asthma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this