Modelled CO2 emissions from land use change affected more by nitrogen cycle, than by the choice of land cover data

A K Jain, Prasanth Meiyappan, Yang Song, Joanna Isobel House

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

The high uncertainty in land-based CO2 fluxes estimates is thought to be mainly due to uncertainty in not only quantifying
historical changes among forests, croplands, and grassland, but also due to different processes included in
calculation methods. Inclusion of a nitrogen (N) cycle in models is fairly recent and strongly affects carbon (C) fluxes.
In this study, for the first time, we use a model with C and N dynamics with three distinct historical reconstructions
of land-use and land-use change (LULUC) to quantify LULUC emissions and uncertainty that includes the integrated
effects of not only climate and CO2 but also N. The modeled global average emissions including N dynamics for the
1980s, 1990s, and 2000–2005 were 1.8 0.2, 1.7 0.2, and 1.4 0.2 GtC yr-1, respectively, (mean and range across
LULUC data sets). The emissions from tropics were 0.8 0.2, 0.8 0.2, and 0.7 0.3 GtC yr-1, and the non tropics
were 1.1 0.5, 0.9 0.2, and 0.7 0.1 GtC y-1. Compared to previous studies that did not include N dynamics,
modeled net LULUC emissions were higher, particularly in the non tropics. In the model, N limitation reduces
regrowth rates of vegetation in temperate areas resulting in higher net emissions. Our results indicate that exclusion
of N dynamics leads to an underestimation of LULUC emissions by around 70% in the non tropics, 10% in the tropics,
and 40% globally in the 1990s. The differences due to inclusion/exclusion of the N cycle of 0.1 GtC y-1 in the tropics,
0.6 GtC yr-1 in the non tropics, and 0.7 GtC yr-1 globally (mean across land-cover data sets) in the 1990s were
greater than differences due to the land-cover data in the non tropics and globally (0.2 GtC yr-1). While land-cover
information is improving with satellite and inventory data, this study indicates the importance of accounting for
different processes, in particular the N cycle.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2893
Number of pages2906
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume19
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Bibliographical note

This paper was thought so important that Nature asked Julia Pongratz to write a "news and views" exclusively about this paper.
Pongratz, J. (2013). Plant a tree, but tend it well. Nature, 498, 47-48.

Keywords

  • carbon cycle
  • nitrogen cycle
  • land use change
  • cliamte change
  • carbon emissions
  • model

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Modelled CO2 emissions from land use change affected more by nitrogen cycle, than by the choice of land cover data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this