Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

National review of end-of-life care withdrawal guidelines for non-invasive advanced respiratory support using document analysis

  • David Wenzel*
  • , Thomas Jefferies
  • , Rachel A Davies
  • , Jennifer Creese
  • , Eleanor Wilson
  • , Christina Faull
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives
This study aims to understand the breadth of practice around end-of-life withdrawal of non-invasive advanced respiratory support (encompassing both continuous positive airway pressure and non-invasive ventilation) by analysing NHS-published guidelines and guidance for clinicians. This study seeks validity in the guidelines through a confluence of findings and reassurance of practice despite having little to no high-quality research to inform the content of the guidelines. Ultimately, where discordance is found between guidelines, there will be a strong mandate for future research.

Methods
Guidelines were gathered through snowball sampling and analysed using document analysis techniques. Analysis was mixed in inductive and deductive and facilitated across several authors using framework analysis. 20 guidelines were analysed but saturation was found after 15. Further guidelines were analysed beyond saturation to provide reassurance of the endpoint of the study.

Results
There were common components to the guidelines presented as themes: legal and ethical frameworks, decision-making around withdrawal, the process of withdrawal, post-withdrawal care and when to contact palliative care. There were significant areas of confluence, where multiple guidelines were in agreement on best practice. However, there was significant discordance in some key areas including the use of post-withdrawal oxygen therapy and pressure weaning practice.

Conclusion
his study provides reassurance through a confluence of findings for the majority of withdrawal practices. However, key areas of discordance highlight an urgent need for further research to support clinicians, patients and their families during challenging clinical events.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere089617
Pages (from-to)e089617
Number of pages8
JournalBMJ Open
Volume14
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Research Groups and Themes

  • Palliative and End of Life Care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'National review of end-of-life care withdrawal guidelines for non-invasive advanced respiratory support using document analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this