Negative expectations and vulnerability to stressors in animals

Ben Lecorps, Daniel Weary, marina von Keyerslingk*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Humans express stable differences in pessimism that render some individuals more vulnerable to stressors and mood disorders. We explored whether non-human animals express stable individual differences in expectations (assessed via judgment bias tests) and whether these differences relate to susceptibility to stressors. Judgment bias tests do not distinguish pessimism from sensitivity to reinforcers; negative expectations are likely driven by a combination of these two elements. The available evidence suggests that animals express stable individual differences in expectations such that some persistently perceive ambiguous situations in a more negative way. A lack of research prevents drawing firm conclusions on how negative expectations affect responses to stressors, but current evidence suggests a link between negative expectations and the adoption of avoidance coping strategies, stronger responses to uncontrollable stressors and risk of mood-related disorders. We explore implications for animals living in captivity and for research using animals as models for human disorders.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Negative expectations and vulnerability to stressors in animals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this