Abstract
For several decades, myths about the brain — neuromyths — have persisted in schools and colleges, often being used to justify ineffective approaches to teaching. Many of these myths are biased distortions of scientific fact. Cultural conditions, such as differences in terminology and language, have contributed to a 'gap' between neuroscience and education that has shielded these distortions from scrutiny. In recent years, scientific communications across this gap have increased, although the messages are often distorted by the same conditions and biases as those responsible for neuromyths. In the future, the establishment of a new field of inquiry that is dedicated to bridging neuroscience and education may help to inform and to improve these communications.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 817-824 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Nature Reviews Neuroscience |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 12 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 15 Oct 2014 |
Research Groups and Themes
- CRICBristol
Keywords
- EDUCATION
- NEUROSCIENCE
- Public engagement
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Neuroscience and education: myths and messages'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Equipment
-
Clinical Research and Imaging Centre (CRICBristol)
Thai, J. (Manager), Bucciarelli-Ducci, C. (Other) & Gilchrist, I. (Other)
Bristol Medical School (THS)Facility/equipment: Facility
Profiles
-
Professor Paul A Howard-Jones
- School of Education - Professor of Neuroscience and Education
- Educational Futures Network
- Centre for Teaching, Learning and Curriculum
- Centre for Psychological Approaches for Studying Education
- Cabot Institute for the Environment
- Bristol Neuroscience
Person: Academic , Member