TY - JOUR
T1 - New developments in the delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy
T2 - targeted lead placement, multi-site and endocardial pacing
AU - Sohal, Manav
AU - Chen, Zhong
AU - Sammut, Eva
AU - Jackson, Tom
AU - Behar, Jonathan
AU - Carr-White, Gerald
AU - Razavi, Reza
AU - Rinaldi, Christopher A
PY - 2014/5
Y1 - 2014/5
N2 - Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a proven treatment adjunct for selected patients with heart failure and evidence of ventricular dyssynchrony. When applying most contemporary guidelines the accepted response rate has remained static with up to one-third of patients failing to respond. Empiric lateral/posterolateral lead positioning may not be the optimal strategy in all patients, particularly in those with extensive scar and there have been developments that suggest an approach whereby the latest mechanically activating segment is targeted for left ventricular (LV) lead placement may be of some benefit. Additionally, alternative means of delivering CRT, either by means of multi-site pacing or LV endocardial pacing, have similarly shown promise. At a time where novel predictors of response to CRT have proved disappointing in multi-center trials, a paradigm shift away from prediction towards better delivery of CRT may potentially be of most benefit to the significant minority who do not respond.
AB - Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a proven treatment adjunct for selected patients with heart failure and evidence of ventricular dyssynchrony. When applying most contemporary guidelines the accepted response rate has remained static with up to one-third of patients failing to respond. Empiric lateral/posterolateral lead positioning may not be the optimal strategy in all patients, particularly in those with extensive scar and there have been developments that suggest an approach whereby the latest mechanically activating segment is targeted for left ventricular (LV) lead placement may be of some benefit. Additionally, alternative means of delivering CRT, either by means of multi-site pacing or LV endocardial pacing, have similarly shown promise. At a time where novel predictors of response to CRT have proved disappointing in multi-center trials, a paradigm shift away from prediction towards better delivery of CRT may potentially be of most benefit to the significant minority who do not respond.
KW - Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
KW - Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/trends
KW - Electrodes
KW - Heart Ventricles/physiopathology
KW - Humans
U2 - 10.1586/17434440.2014.885320
DO - 10.1586/17434440.2014.885320
M3 - Review article (Academic Journal)
C2 - 24597890
SN - 1743-4440
VL - 11
SP - 295
EP - 304
JO - Expert Review of Medical Devices
JF - Expert Review of Medical Devices
IS - 3
ER -