New insights into US flood vulnerability revealed from flood insurance big data

Oliver E J Wing*, Nicholas Pinter, Paul D Bates, Carolyn Kousky

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

45 Downloads (Pure)


Improvements in modelling power and input data have vastly improved the precision of physical flood models, but translation into economic outputs requires depth–damage functions that are inadequately verified. In particular, flood damage is widely assumed to increase monotonically with water depth. Here, we assess flood vulnerability in the US using >2 million claims from the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). NFIP claims data are messy, but the size of the dataset provides powerful empirical tests of damage patterns and modelling approaches. We show that current depth–damage functions consist of disparate relationships that match poorly with observations. Observed flood losses are not monotonic functions of depth, but instead better follow a beta function, with bimodal distributions for different water depths. Uncertainty in flood losses has been called the main bottleneck in flood risk studies, an obstacle that may be remedied using large-scale empirical flood damage data.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1444 (2020)
Number of pages10
JournalNature Communications
Publication statusPublished - 19 Mar 2020


  • civil engineering
  • hydrology
  • natural hazards
  • water resources

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'New insights into US flood vulnerability revealed from flood insurance big data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this