Non-professional healthcare workers and ethical obligations to work during pandemic influenza

Heather Draper*, Tom Sorell, Jonathan Ives, Sarah Damery, Sheila Greenfield, Jayne Parry, Judith Petts, Sue Wilson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)


Most academic papers on ethics in pandemics concentrate on the duties of healthcare professionals. This paper will consider non-professional healthcare workers: do they have a moral obligation to work during an influenza pandemic If so, is this an obligation that outweighs others they might have, e.g., as parents, and should such an obligation be backed up by the coercive power of law This paper considers whether non-professional healthcare workers - porters, domestic service workers, catering staff, clerks, IT support workers, etc. - have an obligation to work during an influenza pandemic. It uses data collected as part of a study looking at the attitudes of healthcare workers to working during a pandemic to suggest the philosophical arguments explored. These include: being in a position to do good, the ethics of work, competing obligations to family members and in particular to children and the obligations of citizens in a state of national emergency. We also look at whether compulsory measures are justified to support a national health service during a health emergency. We conclude that even if they are, compulsion should not be restricted to non-professionals who happen to be working in the health service at the time. Rather, compulsion involving a larger pool of people with the relevant skills and abilities is more equitable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-34
Number of pages12
JournalPublic Health Ethics
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2010


Dive into the research topics of 'Non-professional healthcare workers and ethical obligations to work during pandemic influenza'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this