Normative behaviourism and global political principles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
335 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article takes a new idea, ‘normative behaviourism’, and applies it to global political theory, in order to address at least one of the problems we might have in mind when accusing that subject of being too ‘unrealistic’. The core of this idea is that political principles can be justified, not just by patterns in our thinking, and in particular our intuitions and considered judgements, but also by patterns in our behaviour, and in particular acts of insurrection and crime. The problem addressed is ‘cultural relativism’, understood here not as a meta-ethical doctrine but as the apparent ‘fact’ that people around the world have culturally varying intuitions and judgements of a kind that lead them to affirm different political principles. This is a problem because it seems to follow (1) that global agreement on any substantial set of political principles is impossible and (2) that any political theory in denial of this ‘fact’ would be, for that reason, deeply unrealistic. The solution to this problem argued for here is that if domestic political principles (i.e. principles intended to regulate a single state) could be justified by normative behaviourism, and in reference to culturally invariant behaviour, then an international system supportive of such principles is justifiable by extension.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)152-168
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of International Political Theory
Volume12
Issue number2
Early online date17 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016

Keywords

  • normative behaviourism
  • justification
  • cosmopolitanism

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Normative behaviourism and global political principles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this