Nutritional interventions and outcome in patients with cancer or preinvasive lesions: systematic review

AA Davies, RM Harbord, G Davey Smith, GE Bekkering, JAC Sterne, R Beynon, SJ Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

72 Citations (Scopus)


Background: Dietary modifications and supplements are used widely by patients with cancer and preinvasive lesions as an adjunct to standard treatment. Given the widespread use of nutritional modifications and supplements by such patients and concerns about the lack of benefit and possible harm, we conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to examine the effect of nutritional interventions on patients with cancer or preinvasive lesions. Methods: We searched electronic databases and reference lists to locate all eligible trials and analyzed trial quality. Outcome measures were all-cause and cancer mortality, disease-free survival, cancer recurrence, second primary cancer, recurrence of a preinvasive lesion, or progression to cancer. Results of individual trials were combined by use of random-effects meta-analyses. Results: We identified 59 eligible trials, 25 in patients with cancer and 34 in patients with preinvasive lesions, respectively. Trial quality was generally low; only three trials (two of cancer and one of preinvasive lesions) had adequate methods for generating the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, and masking both outcome assessors and participants. The combined odds ratio (OR) for the effect of a healthy diet - given alone or with dietary supplements, weight loss, or exercise - on all-cause mortality was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.46 to 1.77). There was no evidence of an association between the use of antioxidant (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.15) or retinol (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.13) supplements and all-cause mortality. Meta-analyses of all other outcomes did not show clear evidence of benefit or harm. Conclusions: The impact of most nutritional interventions cannot be reliably estimated because of the limited number of trials, many of which were of low quality. There is no evidence that dietary modification by cancer patients improves survival and benefits disease prognosis.
Translated title of the contributionNutritional interventions and outcome in patients with cancer or preinvasive lesions: systematic review
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)961 - 973
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume98 (14)
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2006

Bibliographical note

Publisher: Oxford University Press


Dive into the research topics of 'Nutritional interventions and outcome in patients with cancer or preinvasive lesions: systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this