Nymphgate, Nudity, and Moral Excellence

James Harrison*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

In 2018, the artist Sonia Boyce removed John William Waterhouse's Hylas and the Nymphs (1896) from the wall of Manchester Art Gallery. Journalists termed the controversy that accompanied the removal "Nymphgate." In this dispute over the ethics of the nude, the conflicting visions of Victorian critics regarding the relationship of the good to the beautiful recurred with surprising fidelity. This article draws on Uranian poetry, Victorian classical historiography, and quasi-medical inquiries into the origins of same-sex desire to contextualize Hylas and the Nymphs and to identify the aspects of the painting's iconography that the debate over its display tended to overlook.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-271
Number of pages31
JournalCusp: Late 19th-/Early 20th-Century Cultures
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Aug 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nymphgate, Nudity, and Moral Excellence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this