Abstract
The use of Wi-Fi signals for human sensing has gained significant interest over the past decade. Such techniques provide affordable and reliable solutions for healthcare-focused events such as vital sign detection, prevention of falls and long-term monitoring of chronic diseases, among others. Currently, there are two major approaches for Wi-Fi sensing: (1) passive Wi-Fi radar (PWR) which uses well established techniques from bistatic radar, and channel state information (CSI) based wireless sensing (SENS) which exploits human-induced variations in the communication channel between a pair of transmitter and receiver. However, there has not been a comprehensive study to understand and compare the differences in terms of effectiveness and limitations in real-world deployment. In this paper, we present the fundamentals of the two systems with associated methodologies and signal processing. A thorough measurement campaign was carried out to evaluate the human activity detection performance of both systems. Experimental results show that SENS system provides better detection performance in a line-of-sight (LoS) condition, whereas PWR system performs better in a non-LoS (NLoS) setting. Furthermore, based on our findings, we recommend that future Wi-Fi sensing applications should leverage the advantages from both PWR and SENS systems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 607-620 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 1 Jan 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2002-2012 IEEE.
Keywords
- Channel State Information
- Doppler
- Passive Wi-Fi Radar
- Wireless Sensing