Abstract
Hamilton's theory of inclusive fitnesstness is a widely-used framework for study-ing the evolution of social behaviour, but controversy surrounds its status. Hamilton originally derived his famous rb > c rule for the spread of a social gene by assuming additivity of costs and benefits. However it has recently been argued that the additivity assumption can be dispensed with, so long as the -c and b terms are suitably dened, as partial regression coecients. I argue that this way of generalizing Hamilton's rule to the non-additive case, while formally correct, faces conceptual problems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 873-883 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Philosophy of Science |
| Volume | 83 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 16 Jun 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On Hamilton's Rule and Inclusive Fitness Theory with Non-additive Payoffs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver