On the Censorship of Conspiracy Theories

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
74 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Is it permissible for the state to censor or suppress conspiracy theories, even within liberal democracies? According to a number of political and legal theorists, it is. In this paper, I will argue that the state may sometimes censor conspiracy theories, but it should be permitted to do so only after very strict conditions have been met. I shall first offer some brief thoughts about the definition of ‘conspiracy theory’. I will then critique one existing attempt to address this issue – namely Cíbik and Hardoš’s public reason approach. Next, I shall outline my own proposal. I will argue that we should sometimes consider conspiracy theorising to be a form of discriminatory speech against vulnerable individuals and groups, and we can consider it to be a form of defamation in these cases. Consequently, the state may sometimes be permitted to enact civil laws to sanction such theorising. Finally, I will outline some of the conditions that should be met before state censorship can be considered.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalSocial Epistemology
Early online date30 Jan 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 30 Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the Censorship of Conspiracy Theories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this