On the Modal Content of A Posteriori Necessities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)


This paper challenges the Kripkean interpretation of a posteriori necessities. It will be demonstrated, by an analysis of classic examples, that the modal content of supposed a posteriori necessities is more complicated than the Kripkean line suggests. We will see that further research is needed concerning the a priori principles underlying all a posteriori necessities. In the course of this analysis it will emerge that the modal content of a posteriori necessities can be best described in terms of a Finean conception of modality – by giving essences priority over modality. The upshot of this is that we might be able to establish the necessity of certain supposed a posteriori necessities by a priori means.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)344-357
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2009


  • Metaphysics
  • A posteriori necessity
  • Modality
  • Essence


Dive into the research topics of 'On the Modal Content of A Posteriori Necessities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this