On the politics of discomfort

Rachelle Chadwick*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article engages the politics of discomfort as a critical but neglected dimension of feminist methodologies and research praxis. Discomfort is explored as a ‘sweaty concept’ that opens space for transformative praxis and the emergence of feminist forms of knowing, being and resisting. I theorise discomfort as an epistemic and interpretive resource and a lively actant in research encounters, fieldwork and analytic and theory-praxis spaces. Building on the work of Clare Hemmings and Sara Ahmed, I trace discomfort as an affective intensity that matters for opening up resistant and anti-colonial feminist research practices and modes of knowledge production. Starting, and staying, with discomfortis theorised as a form of resistance to the reiteration of comfortable and normative truths and ‘wilful ignorances’. Weaving together the work of postqualitative and postcolonial feminist theorists, the sticky praxis of discomfort is conceptualised as involving a number of research strategies, including: (1) engaging with ‘gut feelings’ and (2) embracing interpretive hesitancy. In moving beyond an idealisation of empathy as the central affective principle underlying feminist research praxis, this article explores the epistemic and political salience of discomfort as affective intensity, ‘sweaty concept’ and potentially transformative interpretive resource.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)556-574
Number of pages19
JournalFeminist Theory
Volume22
Issue number4
Early online date20 Jan 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.

Keywords

  • Affective methodologies
  • affective praxis
  • discomfort
  • epistemic politics
  • feminist research praxis
  • interpretive hesitancy
  • whiteness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the politics of discomfort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this