Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

On the Use of High-Resolution and Deep-Learning Seismic Catalogs for Short-Term Earthquake Forecasts: Potential Benefits and Current Limitations

  • Simone Mancini*
  • , Margarita Segou
  • , Max Werner
  • , Tom Parsons
  • , Gregory Beroza
  • , Lauro Chiaraluce
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)
163 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Enhanced earthquake catalogs provide detailed images of evolving seismic sequences. Currently, these data sets take some time to be released but will soon become available in real time. Here, we explore whether and how enhanced seismic catalogs feeding into established short-term earthquake forecasting protocols may result in higher predictive skill. We consider three enhanced catalogs for the 2016–2017 Central Italy sequence, featuring a bulk completeness lower by at least two magnitude units compared to the real-time catalog and an improved hypocentral resolution. We use them to inform a set of physical Coulomb Rate-and-State (CRS) and statistical Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) models to forecast the space-time occurrence of M3+ events during the first 6 months of the sequence. We track model performance using standard likelihood-based metrics and compare their skill against the best-performing CRS and ETAS models among those developed with the real-time catalog. We find that while the incorporation of the triggering contributions from new small magnitude detections of the enhanced catalogs is beneficial for both types of forecasts, these models do not significantly outperform their respective near real-time benchmarks. To explore the reasons behind this result, we perform targeted sensitivity tests that show how (a) the typical spatial discretizations of forecast experiments (≥2 km) hamper the ability of models to capture highly localized secondary triggering patterns and (b) differences in earthquake parameters (i.e., magnitude and hypocenters) reported in different catalogs can affect forecast evaluation. These findings will contribute toward improving forecast model design and evaluation strategies for next-generation seismic catalogs.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2022JB025202
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Volume127
Issue number11
Early online date31 Oct 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Nov 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was supported by the project “” (NE/R000794/1NE/R0000794/1), funded by the UK National Environment Research Council (NERC) and the United States National Science Foundation, Directorate for Geosciences (NSFGEO). The authors would like to thank the participants in the project for the fruitful discussion and the constructive comments that improved the quality of the manuscript. This study has also received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant Agreement Number 821115, Real‐time earthquake rIsk reduction for a reSilient Europe, RISE, http://www.rise-eu.org ). The authors thank Daniel Trugman and an anonymous reviewer for the insightful comments that helped us improving the clarity and quality of the paper. The Central Apennines Earthquake Cascade Under a New Microscope

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022. The Authors.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the Use of High-Resolution and Deep-Learning Seismic Catalogs for Short-Term Earthquake Forecasts: Potential Benefits and Current Limitations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this