Open Science and Research Reproducibility

Marcus Munafò

doi:10.3332/ecancer.2016.ed56

Open Science and Research Reproducibility

Marcus Munafò

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial (Academic Journal) › peer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

344 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Many scientists, journals and funders are concerned about the low reproducibility of many scientific findings. One approach that may serve to improve the reliability and robustness of research is open science. Here I argue that the process of pre-registering study protocols, sharing study materials and data, and posting preprints of manuscripts may serve to improve quality control procedures at every stage of the research pipeline, and in turn improve the reproducibility of published work.

Original language	English
Article number	ed56
Number of pages	3
Journal	ecancermedicalscience
Volume	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2016.ed56
Publication status	Published - 7 Jun 2016

Research Groups and Themes

Brain and Behaviour
Tobacco and Alcohol

Access to Document

10.3332/ecancer.2016.ed56

Full-text PDF (final published version)
This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Cancer Intelligence at http://ecancer.org/journal/editorial/56-open-science-and-research-reproducibility.php. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
Final published version, 337 KBLicence: CC BY

Handle.net

Persistent link

Embargoed Document

Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)
Accepted author manuscript, 177 KB
Request copy

Cite this

@article{d06fe7bb43eb415c8d9c5fe4f53dfcf8,

title = "Open Science and Research Reproducibility",

abstract = "Many scientists, journals and funders are concerned about the low reproducibility of many scientific findings. One approach that may serve to improve the reliability and robustness of research is open science. Here I argue that the process of pre-registering study protocols, sharing study materials and data, and posting preprints of manuscripts may serve to improve quality control procedures at every stage of the research pipeline, and in turn improve the reproducibility of published work.",

author = "Marcus Munaf{\`o}",

year = "2016",

month = jun,

day = "7",

doi = "10.3332/ecancer.2016.ed56",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

journal = "ecancermedicalscience",

issn = "1754-6605",

publisher = "Cancer Intelligence",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open Science and Research Reproducibility

AU - Munafò, Marcus

PY - 2016/6/7

Y1 - 2016/6/7

N2 - Many scientists, journals and funders are concerned about the low reproducibility of many scientific findings. One approach that may serve to improve the reliability and robustness of research is open science. Here I argue that the process of pre-registering study protocols, sharing study materials and data, and posting preprints of manuscripts may serve to improve quality control procedures at every stage of the research pipeline, and in turn improve the reproducibility of published work.

AB - Many scientists, journals and funders are concerned about the low reproducibility of many scientific findings. One approach that may serve to improve the reliability and robustness of research is open science. Here I argue that the process of pre-registering study protocols, sharing study materials and data, and posting preprints of manuscripts may serve to improve quality control procedures at every stage of the research pipeline, and in turn improve the reproducibility of published work.

U2 - 10.3332/ecancer.2016.ed56

DO - 10.3332/ecancer.2016.ed56

M3 - Editorial (Academic Journal)

C2 - 27350794

SN - 1754-6605

VL - 10

JO - ecancermedicalscience

JF - ecancermedicalscience

M1 - ed56

ER -

Open Science and Research Reproducibility

Abstract

Research Groups and Themes

Access to Document

Handle.net

Embargoed Document

Fingerprint

Cite this