This article analyses the Court of Appeal decision in R (on the application of Rogers) v Swindon NHS PCT and Secretary of State for Health. It argues that the decision demonstrates that the courts are prepared to intervene to ensure that decision-making on allocation of healthcare resources is transparent, and thus publicly acceptable.
|Translated title of the contribution||Opening Eyes to the Reality of Scarce Resources?|
|Pages (from-to)||664 - 673|
|Number of pages||10|
|Publication status||Published - 2006|