Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Opening the door to anti-system leaders? Anti-corruption campaigns and the global rise of populism

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Almost all anti-corruption drives contain an awareness raising element. However, recent research reveals that anti-corruption awareness raising messages can backfire by triggering a sense that corruption is too big of a problem to tackle, thus encouraging resignation rather than resistance. We advance this literature by exploring another potential unintended impact. Corruption scandals have played a prominent role in the rise of many populist leaders, who claim to challenge ‘the corrupt status quo’. We test whether anti-corruption messages that call attention to the problem unintentionally help to foster populist attitudes through an original survey experiment in Albania. Breaking new ground by testing messages based on descriptive (how the world is) and injunctive (how people want it to be) norms, we find that while the latter has no effect, exposure to the former – which is more common in contemporary anti-corruption campaigns – is associated with greater agreement with populist sentiments and beliefs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)134-155
Number of pages22
JournalEuropean Journal of Political Research
Volume64
Issue number1
Early online date24 Apr 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Political Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Consortium for Political Research.

Research Groups and Themes

  • SPS Governance and Public Policy Research Centre

Keywords

  • populism
  • corruption
  • anti-system
  • democracy
  • descriptive norms
  • injunctive norms
  • Albania

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Opening the door to anti-system leaders? Anti-corruption campaigns and the global rise of populism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this