Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Optimising the use of the prostate-specific antigen blood test in asymptomatic men for early prostate cancer detection in primary care: report from a UK clinical consensus

  • Tom Harding*
  • , Richard M Martin
  • , Samuel W D Merriel
  • , Rob Jones
  • , Joe O'Sullivan
  • , Mike Kirby
  • , Bunmi Olajide
  • , Alexander Norman
  • , Jaimin Bhatt
  • , Oliver Hulson
  • , Tanimola Martins
  • , Vincent Gnanapragasam
  • , Jonathan Aning
  • , Meg Burgess
  • , Derek J. Rosario
  • , Nora Pashayan
  • , Abel Tesfai
  • , Natalia Norori
  • , Amy Rylance
  • , Andrew Seggie*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background:
Screening is not recommended for prostate cancer in the UK. Asymptomatic men aged ≥50 years can request a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test following counselling on potential harms and benefits. There are areas of clinical uncertainty among GPs, resulting in the content and quality of counselling varying.

Aim:
To produce a consensus that can influence guidelines for UK primary care on the optimal use of the PSA test in asymptomatic men for early prostate cancer detection.

Design and setting:
Prostate Cancer UK facilitated a RAND/UCLA consensus.

Method:
Statements covering five topics were developed with a subgroup of experts. A panel of 15 experts in prostate cancer scored (round one) statements on a scale of one (strongly disagree) to nine (strongly agree). Panellists met to discuss statements before rescoring (round two). A lived experience panel of seven men scored a subset of statements with outcomes fed into the main panel.

Results:
Of the initial 94 statements reviewed by the expert panel, a final 48/85 (56%) achieved consensus. In the absence of screening, there was consensus on proactive approaches to initiate discussions about the PSA test with men who were at higher-than-average risk.

Conclusion:
Improvements in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway may have reduced some of the harms associated with PSA testing; however, several areas of uncertainty remain in relation to screening, including optimal PSA thresholds for referral and intervals for retesting. There is consensus on proactive approaches to testing in higher-than-average risk groups. This should prompt a review of current guidelines.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e534-e543
Number of pages10
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Volume74
Issue number745
Early online date22 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Authors.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimising the use of the prostate-specific antigen blood test in asymptomatic men for early prostate cancer detection in primary care: report from a UK clinical consensus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this