Abstract
We investigate the cross‐sectional relationship between stock returns and a number of measures of option‐implied beta. Using portfolio analysis, we show that the method proposed by Buss and Vilkov (2012, The Review of Financial Studies, 2525, 3113–3140) leads to a stronger relationship between implied beta and stock returns than other approaches. However, using the Fama and MacBeth (1973, Journal of Political Economy, 8181, 607–636) cross‐section regression methodology, we show that the relationship is not robust to the inclusion of other firm characteristics. We further show that a similar result holds for implied downside beta. We, therefore, conclude that there is no robust relation between option‐implied beta and returns.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 94-108 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of Futures Markets |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 14 Jun 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2019 |
Research Groups and Themes
- AF Financial Markets
Keywords
- cross section
- downside beta
- option-implied beta
- stock returns
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Option-implied betas and the cross section of stock returns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Professor Richard D F Harris
- School of Accounting and Finance - Business School - Professor of Finance
Person: Academic