Organization and Structures for Detection and Monitoring of CKD Across World Countries and Regions: Observational Data From a Global Survey

Fergus J Caskey, Somkanya Tungsanga*, Winston Wing Shing Fung, Ikechi G. Okpechi, Feng Ye, Anukul Ghimire, et al.

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Rationale & Objective
Established therapeutic interventions effectively mitigate the risk and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Countries and regions have a compelling need for organizational structures that enable early identification of people with CKD who can benefit from these proven interventions. We aimed to report the current global status of CKD detection programs.

Study Design
A multinational cross-sectional survey.

Setting & Participants
Stakeholders, including nephrologist leaders, policymakers, and patient advocates from 167 countries, participating in the International Society of Nephrology (ISN) survey from June to September 2022.

Outcomes
Structures for the detection and monitoring of CKD, including CKD surveillance systems in the form of registries, community-based detection programs, case-finding practices, and availability of measurement tools for risk identification.

Analytical Approach
Descriptive statistics.

Results
Of all participating countries, 19% (n=31) reported CKD registries and 25% (n=40) reported implementing CKD detection programs as part of their national policies. There were variations in CKD detection program, with 50% (n=20) using a reactive approach (managing cases as identified) and 50% (n=20) actively pursuing case-finding in at-risk populations. Routine case-finding for CKD in high-risk populations was widespread, particularly for diabetes (n=152; 91%) and hypertension (n=148; 89%). Access to diagnostic tools, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR), was limited, especially in low-income (LICs) and lower-middle-income (LMICs) countries, at primary (eGFR: LICs 22%, LMICs 39%, UACR: LICs 28%, LMICs 39%) and secondary/tertiary healthcare levels (eGFR: LICs 39%, LMICs 73%, UACR: LICs 44%, LMICs 70%), potentially hindering CKD detection.

Limitations
A lack of detailed data prevented an in-depth analysis.

Conclusion
This comprehensive survey highlights a global heterogeneity in the organization and structures (surveillance systems, detection programs and tools) for early identification of CKD. Ongoing efforts should be geared toward bridging such disparities to optimally prevent the onset and progression of CKD and its complications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-468.e1
JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume84
Issue number4
Early online date22 May 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 22 May 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Organization and Structures for Detection and Monitoring of CKD Across World Countries and Regions: Observational Data From a Global Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this