Abstract
n this paper, we reflect upon the ethical dilemmas faced during our research exploring the potential of Google Glass as a self-care technology for people with Parkinson's. Our project involved two stages of research: an initial study that explored the overall acceptability and responses of people with Parkinson's to the technology; and a follow-up study that examined participants’ experiences of the technology in more depth through further trials and a series of co-design activities. While our first trials were successful, leading to publication and subsequent local and national publicity, our follow-up trials were hampered by technical problems that were often out of our control. We highlight how participants’ heightened expectations prior to the second trial, as a result of public discourse around the project, were difficult to meet. This led to our participants articulating their frustrations, feelings of lowered self-confidence, and …
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 27 |
| Number of pages | 44 |
| Journal | Interacting with Computers |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Research Groups and Themes
- Digital Health
Keywords
- Digital Health
- Parkinson's disease
- Google Glass
- Ethics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Our year with the glass: expectations, letdowns and ethical dilemmas of technology trials with vulnerable people'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver