Outcomes following childhood arterial ischaemic stroke: A Delphi Consensus on what parents want from future research

Hannah Edwards, Melissa Dunlop, Andrew Mallick, Finbar O'Callaghan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIM: Currently there are few population-based data on the outcomes of stroke in childhood, and no data on what parents want from such research. We conducted a Delphi Consensus Process among parents of children (n = 26) who had suffered an arterial ischaemic stroke to investigate which research outcomes they think are most important to follow up, and what methods of assessment they would find most acceptable.

METHODS: A postal Delphi Consensus Process was conducted.

RESULTS: The Delphi panel reached consensus that motor, cognitive and communication outcomes are the most important outcome domains to assess. They strongly preferred home visits over hospital visits or telephone interview. The majority were happy with assessment visits lasting up to 1.5 h. Ongoing concerns for panel members related to the cause of the original stroke, the risk of recurrence and the long term outcome for their child.

INTERPRETATION: Future outcome studies should preferably assess outcomes at home and focus on children's motor, cognitive and communication abilities. There is an ongoing need to clarify issues with regards to the likely cause of children's strokes and their risk of recurrence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181-7
JournalEuropean Journal of Paediatric Neurology
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Dec 2014

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes following childhood arterial ischaemic stroke: A Delphi Consensus on what parents want from future research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this