Skip to content

Overcoming Indecision by Changing the Decision Boundary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)776-805
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume146
Issue number6
Early online date13 Apr 2017
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 16 Jan 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 13 Apr 2017
DatePublished (current) - 1 Jun 2017

Abstract

The dominant theoretical framework for decision making asserts that people make decisions by integrating noisy evidence to a threshold. It has recently been shown that in many ecologically realistic situations, decreasing the decision boundary maximizes the reward available from decisions. However, empirical support for decreasing boundaries in humans is scant. To investigate this problem, we used an ideal observer model to identify the conditions under which participants should change their decision boundaries with time to maximize reward rate. We conducted 6 expanded-judgment experiments that precisely matched the assumptions of this theoretical model. In this paradigm, participants could sample noisy, binary evidence presented sequentially. Blocks of trials were fixed in duration, and each trial was an independent reward opportunity. Participants therefore had to trade off speed (getting as many rewards as possible) against accuracy (sampling more evidence). Having access to the actual evidence samples experienced by participants enabled us to infer the slope of the decision boundary. We found that participants indeed modulated the slope of the decision boundary in the direction predicted by the ideal observer model, although we also observed systematic deviations from optimality. Participants using suboptimal boundaries do so in a robust manner, so that any error in their boundary setting is relatively inexpensive. The use of a normative model provides insight into what variable(s) human decision makers are trying to optimize. Furthermore, this normative model allowed us to choose diagnostic experiments and in doing so we present clear evidence for time-varying boundaries.

    Structured keywords

  • Cognitive Science
  • Visual Perception

    Research areas

  • decision-making, decision threshold, decreasing bounds, optimal decisions, reward rate

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). The final published version (version of record) is available online via American Psychological Association at http://psycnet.apa.org/psycarticles/2017-16730-001. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 3 MB, PDF document

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups