Abstract
This forum article discusses how the Covid19-pandemic as a major
public crisis is transforming the relationship between governments
and management consultants, contributing to the deepening presence
of consulting firms in policy-making and governance. It
shows how the crisis has entrenched private advice in public policymaking
as governments are spending millions of dollars on transnational
professional service firms like McKinsey, KPMG, Deloitte
and Accenture to coordinate their pandemic responses. Drawing
from comparative research of India, Australia, UK, Germany and
Canada, we outline how interests have been aligned through
both the state’s demand for quick advice and the readily available
supply of expertise provided by firms seeking to expand their
markets. In this context, we note that professional services firms
have been able to leverage their scope, scale, speed and networks
in deepening their role in governance, moving beyond simply
advising governments to providing core administrative functions.
We conclude by discussing the implications for democracy and the
possibilities for contestation.
public crisis is transforming the relationship between governments
and management consultants, contributing to the deepening presence
of consulting firms in policy-making and governance. It
shows how the crisis has entrenched private advice in public policymaking
as governments are spending millions of dollars on transnational
professional service firms like McKinsey, KPMG, Deloitte
and Accenture to coordinate their pandemic responses. Drawing
from comparative research of India, Australia, UK, Germany and
Canada, we outline how interests have been aligned through
both the state’s demand for quick advice and the readily available
supply of expertise provided by firms seeking to expand their
markets. In this context, we note that professional services firms
have been able to leverage their scope, scale, speed and networks
in deepening their role in governance, moving beyond simply
advising governments to providing core administrative functions.
We conclude by discussing the implications for democracy and the
possibilities for contestation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 371-381 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Critical Policy Studies |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 15 Jun 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We want to thank forum-editor Kathrin Braun for her support and the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords
- Global public policy
- strategies
- policy advice
- covid-19
- professional service firms
- crisis management