Pareto Cone ε-Dominance: Improving Convergence and Diversity in Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms

Lucas S. Batista, Felipe Campelo, Frederico Guimarães, Jaime Ramirez*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference Contribution (Conference Proceeding)

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Relaxed forms of Pareto dominance have been shown to be the most effective way in which evolutionary algorithms can progress towards the Pareto-optimal front with a widely spread distribution of solutions. A popular concept is the ε-dominance technique, which has been employed as an archive update strategy in some multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. In spite of the great usefulness of the ε-dominance concept, there are still difficulties in computing an appropriate value of ε that provides the desirable number of nondominated points. Additionally, several viable solutions may be lost depending on the hypergrid adopted, impacting the convergence and the diversity of the estimate set. We propose the concept of cone ε-dominance, which is a variant of the ε-dominance, to overcome these limitations. Cone ε-dominance maintains the good convergence properties of ε-dominance, provides a better control over the resolution of the estimated Pareto front, and also performs a better spread of solutions along the front. Experimental validation of the proposed cone ε-dominance shows a significant improvement in the diversity of solutions over both the regular Pareto-dominance and the ε-dominance.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEvolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization
Subtitle of host publication6th International Conference, EMO 2011, Ouro Preto, Brazil, April 5-8, 2011, Proceedings
Pages76-90
Number of pages15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Apr 2011

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science
Volume6576
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pareto Cone ε-Dominance: Improving Convergence and Diversity in Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this