Party Support, Values, and Perceptions of Electoral Integrity

Anaid Flesken, Jakob J Hartl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
326 Downloads (Pure)


The legitimacy of the electoral process is crucial for the consolidation of democracy. We here focus on individual perceptions of electoral integrity (IPEI) and seek to understand what factors can explain different degrees of IPEI. In particular, we use the sixth wave of the World Values Survey (2010–14) to examine how antiauthoritarian values affect individuals' directional bias, driven by political party support, in evaluating electoral integrity. The results show that IPEI do depend on an interaction of political party support and the strength of antiauthoritarian values. However, the addition of the latter does not lead to a convergence of integrity evaluations among winners and losers, as may be expected under the assumption that antiauthoritarian values drive voters to more carefully monitor and evaluate the electoral process. Instead, it leads to greater polarization between electoral winners and losers. We explain the result with reference to the motivated reasoning literature on biased information processing: While antiauthoritarian convictions lead people to obtain more information on the electoral process, their political leanings bias their reading of this information, which in effect leads to stronger polarization in perceptions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)707-724
Number of pages18
JournalPolitical Psychology
Issue number3
Early online date17 May 2017
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018


  • elections
  • party support
  • political values
  • motivated reasoning
  • World Values Survey


Dive into the research topics of 'Party Support, Values, and Perceptions of Electoral Integrity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this