Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Comparison of Midterm Results

V Wylde; AW Blom; SL Whitehouse; AH Taylor; GT Pattison; GC Bannister

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.12.001

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Comparison of Midterm Results

V Wylde, AW Blom, SL Whitehouse, AH Taylor, GT Pattison, GC Bannister

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

158 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the midterm functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). A cross-sectional postal audit survey of all consecutive patients who had a primary joint replacement at one orthopedic center 5 to 8 years ago was conducted. Participants completed an Oxford hip score or Oxford knee score, which are self-report measures of functional ability. Completed questionnaires were returned from 1112 THA patients and 613 TKA patients, giving a response rate of 72%. The median Oxford knee score of 26 was significantly worse than the median Oxford hip score of 19 (P <.001). In conclusion, TKA patients experience a significantly poorer functional outcome than THA patients 5 to 8 years postoperatively.

Translated title of the contribution	Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Comparison of Midterm Results
Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	210 - 216
Number of pages	7
Journal	Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume	24(2)
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.12.001
Publication status	Published - Feb 2009

Bibliographical note

Other identifier: Epub 2008 Mar 28

Access to Document

10.1016/j.arth.2007.12.001

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{9430743996a34726844abaacddb51383,

title = "Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Comparison of Midterm Results",

abstract = "The aim of this study was to compare the midterm functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). A cross-sectional postal audit survey of all consecutive patients who had a primary joint replacement at one orthopedic center 5 to 8 years ago was conducted. Participants completed an Oxford hip score or Oxford knee score, which are self-report measures of functional ability. Completed questionnaires were returned from 1112 THA patients and 613 TKA patients, giving a response rate of 72\%. The median Oxford knee score of 26 was significantly worse than the median Oxford hip score of 19 (P <.001). In conclusion, TKA patients experience a significantly poorer functional outcome than THA patients 5 to 8 years postoperatively.",

author = "V Wylde and AW Blom and SL Whitehouse and AH Taylor and GT Pattison and GC Bannister",

note = "Other identifier: Epub 2008 Mar 28",

year = "2009",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2007.12.001",

language = "English",

volume = "24(2)",

pages = "210 -- 216",

journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",

issn = "1532-8406",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Comparison of Midterm Results

AU - Wylde, V

AU - Blom, AW

AU - Whitehouse, SL

AU - Taylor, AH

AU - Pattison, GT

AU - Bannister, GC

N1 - Other identifier: Epub 2008 Mar 28

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - The aim of this study was to compare the midterm functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). A cross-sectional postal audit survey of all consecutive patients who had a primary joint replacement at one orthopedic center 5 to 8 years ago was conducted. Participants completed an Oxford hip score or Oxford knee score, which are self-report measures of functional ability. Completed questionnaires were returned from 1112 THA patients and 613 TKA patients, giving a response rate of 72%. The median Oxford knee score of 26 was significantly worse than the median Oxford hip score of 19 (P <.001). In conclusion, TKA patients experience a significantly poorer functional outcome than THA patients 5 to 8 years postoperatively.

AB - The aim of this study was to compare the midterm functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). A cross-sectional postal audit survey of all consecutive patients who had a primary joint replacement at one orthopedic center 5 to 8 years ago was conducted. Participants completed an Oxford hip score or Oxford knee score, which are self-report measures of functional ability. Completed questionnaires were returned from 1112 THA patients and 613 TKA patients, giving a response rate of 72%. The median Oxford knee score of 26 was significantly worse than the median Oxford hip score of 19 (P <.001). In conclusion, TKA patients experience a significantly poorer functional outcome than THA patients 5 to 8 years postoperatively.

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2007.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2007.12.001

M3 - Article (Academic Journal)

C2 - 18534427

SN - 1532-8406

VL - 24(2)

SP - 210

EP - 216

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

ER -

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Comparison of Midterm Results

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this